|
|
I Am Vindicated
I received an email from Larry Becraft in which he comments on my cases, and then insists
that I post them for all the world to see. It seems he was disturbed that some people were referring to my struggles with
the IRS as "losses" instead of "wins". That's because they don't understand what really happened. I have taken the trouble to white out the name of the idiot to whom Larry is referring. With
some people, it's best to let them look stupid. Here's what Larry said: Within the last year or so, I have seen Otto "Mule"
Skinner make the false claim that your 6 cases (the cites to which you have posted to your web
site) were losses and not wins, contrary to what you asserted. Of course, having
read those cases, I knew that "Mule's" assertion was wrong, probably because he had not read the cases. However,
this activity of "Mule" Skinner has continued and he has plainly stated that he has
read those cases. What a liar!! Today, I downloaded those 6 cases and e-mailed
them to you so that you can post them to your site. "Mule" Skinner is clearly engaged
in lying for the sole purpose of attacking others so that he can market his stupid books. I hope that you post those cases
so that the whole world may see that Mule Skinner is in fact a liar.
|
|
|
|
On April 11, 1985, the IRS issued a notice of deficiency to Tavery based upon five items with respect to the joint
returns. Tavery paid the deficiency in its entirety and thereafter filed a claim for a refund of the amounts
paid with the IRS. When this claim was disallowed, Tavery filed suit for refund in the United States District
Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1346(a)(1).
To read the full case, download the .pdf file.
|
Copyright (c) West Group 1998 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works
Tavery v. U.S., 897 F.2d 1032 (10th
Cir. 1990)
Mary Ann
TAVERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED
STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 89-1096.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
March 1, 1990.
Mary Ann Tavery, Denver, Colo., pro se.
|
|
|
Before LOGAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge. (FN*)
LOGAN, Circuit
Judge.
We conclude that because the five items the Commissioner asserted against both Conklin and Tavery were satisfied
by Tavery's payment and the Commissioner conceded the other four items asserted against Conklin alone, the Tax Court should
have dismissed the action as nonjusticiable.
REVERSED.
To read the entire decision, download the .pdf file.
|
Copyright
(c) West Group 1998 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works
Conklin v. C.I.R., 897 F.2d 1027 (10th Cir. 1990)
William T. CONKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 88-2717.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
March 1, 1990.
Richard F. Thurston, Denver, Colo., for petitioner-appellant.
|
 |
|
|
|
